FREE eBriefs Newsletter!
Name:
Email:
City:
State:

Upcoming Events

LLCs Compared to Other Entities Print E-mail

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Various Entities Compared to LLC’s

By Robert M. Swaim, E.A.
May 28, 2009


"C" Corporations

Advantages of an LLC Relative to a "C" Corporation

Tax Consequences to Owners.  The primary advantage of the LLC over the "C" Corporation is in the tax consequences to owners.  As a pass-through entity, the LLC's income and losses flow through and are taxed to or deducted by the members, normally retaining the character they had in the LLC.  Thus, there is a single level of tax, and losses are fully deductible by members (but are subject to passive activity rules and the deduction may not be in excess of their bases in their membership interests).  The income of a C corporation is taxable, both by the federal government and your state, at the corporate tax rate.  Thus the corporation and its shareholders may be subject to "double taxation", when dividends are paid to shareholders because the corporation pays tax on its income and the shareholders pay tax on dividends received from the corporation, and the corporation is not allowed to deduct dividends as an expense.

Structure of the Owners Participation.  The owners of the LLC have greater latitude and flexibility in providing for the return of an owner's investment.  There is also more liberty in structuring the owners participation in the enterprise.

Disadvantages of an LLC Relative to "C" Corporation.

Retention of Earnings.  A venture that intends to retain substantial earnings may find the corporate structure beneficial. It is likely that the marginal corporate tax rate on the retained earnings (only 15% up to 50K) will be lower than the marginal rates applicable to individuals. One needs to carefully study the venture's projections and calculate the estimated after-tax financial performance of the venture before making a decision.

Fringe Benefits.  An LLC taxed as a partnership cannot provide many of the fringe benefits that a "C" Corporation can. Members are not "employees" for purposes of the fringe benefit rules.  See, e.g., IRC 5105(9) relating to accident and health care plans and IRC #79 relating to group term life insurance.  If the LLC provides members with fringe benefits, the cost must be included in the member's gross income. In some states, "C"s can maintain more favorable asset-protected retirement plans.

"S" CORPORATION

Advantages of LLC Relative to "S" Corporation

Restrictions on Ownership.  An "S" Corporation offers the advantage of limited liability for owners, and some of the advantages of being taxed as a partnership.  It does not pay tax on its earnings, and its profits and losses are passed through and taxed directly to its shareholders.  However, there are a number of restrictions on the ownership of and the operation of an "S" corporation that do not apply to an LLC.  The "S" corporation can have only one class of stock.  Its stockholders can be only natural persons, and those persons must be U.S. citizens or resident aliens.  An "S" corporation may have no more than 100 shareholders.

Special Allocations.  Further, an "S" Corporation may not specially allocate tax attributes to its shareholders.  Those attributes pass through pro rata.  This fact restricts the type of debt the corporation may issue, hampers efforts to gradually shift control of family-owned businesses, and in general makes passive investments difficult to structure.

Deductibility of Losses.  An "S" corporation differs in the ability to obtain tax basis from its share of the entity's liability, which determines the extent of losses that may be deducted by the owners, and their ability to receive operating distributions tax free.  An "S" corporation shareholder does not share in the entity liabilities and its basis is limited to the cash invested.  Both an LLC member and a limited partner increase their basis by the allocable share of entity liabilities.  Moreover, distributions of appreciated property trigger a gain to the "S" corporation that passes through to the shareholders.  Also, there is a second entity level tax on built-in gain, if the "S" corporation was formerly a "C".

Disadvantages of LLC Relative to "S" Corporation

The LLC offers the limited liability of the "S" corporation and pass-through taxation with none of the "S" corporation restrictions on ownership and operations.  Therefore, we really cannot see a great deal of general disadvantage.  However, there may be some disadvantages in a special case.

Taxation of LLCs

One-owner LLCs are treated the same as sole proprietorships.  Profits are reported on Schedule C as part of your individual 1040 tax return.  Self-employment taxes on LLC net income must be paid just as you would with any self-employment business.

Multiple owner LLCs are treated as a partnership by the IRS.  The tax return that the LLC completes and files is IRS Form 1065, Partnership Information Return. On this form, LLC profits are reported and allocated to each of the owners according to the LLC's operating agreement.  Each owner is given a Schedule K-1, which shows each owner's share of LLC income or loss.  The owner then reports and pays taxes on this income on the owner's annual 1040 income tax return.

Note that as with a sole proprietorship, all profits of the LLC are taxed to the owners, even if they are not actually distributed by the LLC.  This situation could happen when the LLC needs to use its profits to meet ongoing expenses.

There is a possible third tax treatment that an LLC could elect if it did not want pass-through taxation.  The LLC may elect to be taxed as a corporation by completing IRS Form 8832 and checking the corporate income tax treatment box.  After making this election, the LLC is taxed as a C corporation by the federal government. Because the corporate income tax rates for the first $75,000 of corporate taxable income are lower than the individual income tax rates that apply to the taxable income of non-corporate taxpayers, it is possible a net income tax savings can result from this tax election.

The state income tax treatment of LLC profits typically mirrors the IRS tax treatment as discussed above. Some states have different rules and for specific information on your state rules visit your state's web site.

POTENTIAL MAJOR DISADVANTAGES
OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES

In addition to any disadvantages of LLCs compared to other entities, one should keep in mind the following general drawbacks to the use of LLCs: The legal ramifications of forming and operating an LLC, e.g., tax classification is more uncertain because of the lack of guidance from established case law and regulations.  This may be more theoretical than real.  Other states may not recognize all of the rights and privileges afforded to an LLC in your home state.  If the LLC has one or more members who are non-residents of the LLC state, it must file a list of members and consents with its annual state tax return.  As to any non-resident member who fails to consent to Your state tax jurisdiction, the LLC must pay the tax attributable to the non-consenting member's distributive share of LLC income.  The members of an LLC may have implied authority to act on behalf of the LLC and bind the LLC, e.g. signing of deed of trust (mortgage).

SUMMARY

As a general rule, the LLC will probably serve well in those circumstances where the limited partnership and "S" corporation were formerly used.  The LLC may even be used in those circumstances where the "C" corporation was used.  However, the "C" corporation does have its advantages, particularly with respect to the availability of nontaxable fringe benefits and asset protected retirement plans.  Therefore, we recommend you continue to use the "C" corporation in those circumstances where a "C" corporation was formerly used.  Use an LLC in those situations were a limited partnership (including an FLP, unless a specific estate and gift tax result is desired) or "S" corporation was formerly used.

Robert Swaim holds a Masters in Accounting and is an Enrolled Agent in Atlanta, GA.  He works with real estate investors for tax returns, audit defense and other IRS problems. He can be contacted at 404-607-8400 or This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 
Employee or Independent Contractor? Print E-mail

Employee or Independent Contractor?

By Robert M. Swaim, E.A.
May 28, 2009


An employer must generally withhold federal income taxes, withhold and pay social security and Medicare taxes, and pay unemployment tax on wages paid to an employee.  An employer does not generally have to withhold or pay any taxes on payments to independent contractors.

Common-Law Rules

To determine whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor under the common law, the relationship of the worker and the business must be examined.  In any employee-independent contractor determination, all information that provides evidence of the degree of control and the degree of independence must be considered.

Facts that provide evidence of the degree of control and independence fall into three categories: behavioral control, financial control, and the type of relationship of the parties.  These facts are discussed below.

Behavioral control.   Facts that show whether the business has a right to direct and control how the worker does the task for which the worker is hired include the type and degree of:

Instructions that the business gives to the worker.  An employee is generally subject to the business' instructions about when, where, and how to work.  All of the following are examples of types of instructions about how to do work.

a.. When and where to do the work.

b.. What tools or equipment to use.

c.. What workers to hire or to assist with the work.

d.. Where to purchase supplies and services.

e.. What work must be performed by a specified individual.

f.. What order or sequence to follow.

The amount of instruction needed varies among different jobs.  Even if no instructions are given, sufficient behavioral control may exist if the employer has the right to control how the work results are achieved.  A business may lack the knowledge to instruct some highly specialized professionals; in other cases, the task may require little or no instruction.  The key consideration is whether the business has retained the right to control the details of a worker's performance or instead has given up that right.

Training that the business gives to the worker.   An employee may be trained to perform services in a particular manner.  Independent contractors ordinarily use their own methods.

Financial control.   Facts that show whether the business has a right to control the business aspects of the worker's job include:

The extent to which the worker has unreimbursed business expenses.  Independent contractors are more likely to have unreimbursed expenses than are employees.  Fixed ongoing costs that are incurred regardless of whether work is currently being performed are especially important.  However, employees may also incur unreimbursed expenses in connection with the services that they perform for their business.

The extent of the worker's investment.   An independent contractor often has a significant investment in the facilities he or she uses in performing services for someone else.  However, a significant investment is not necessary for independent contractor status.

The extent to which the worker makes his or her services available to the relevant market.   An independent contractor is generally free to seek out business opportunities.  Independent contractors often advertise, maintain a visible business location, and are available to work in the relevant market.

How the business pays the worker.   An employee is generally guaranteed a regular wage amount for an hourly, weekly, or other period of time.  This usually indicates that a worker is an employee, even when the wage or salary is supplemented by a commission.  An independent contractor is usually paid by a flat fee for the job.  However, it is common in some professions, such as law, to pay independent contractors hourly.

The extent to which the worker can realize a profit or loss.   An independent contractor can make a profit or loss.

Type of relationship.   Facts that show the parties' type of relationship include:

Written contracts describing the relationship the parties intended to create.

Whether or not the business provides the worker with employee-type benefits, such as insurance, a pension plan, vacation pay, or sick pay.

The permanency of the relationship. If you engage a worker with the expectation that the relationship will continue indefinitely, rather than for a specific project or period, this is generally considered evidence that your intent was to create an employer-employee relationship.

The extent to which services performed by the worker are a key aspect of the regular business of the company. If a worker provides services that are a key aspect of your regular business activity, it is more likely that you will have the right to direct and control his or her activities. For example, if a law firm hires an attorney, it is likely that it will present the attorney's work as its own and would have the right to control or direct that work. This would indicate an employer-employee relationship.

Robert Swaim holds a Masters in Accounting and is an Enrolled Agent in Atlanta, GA.  He works with real estate investors for tax returns, audit defense and other IRS problems. He can be contacted at 404-607-8400 or This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 

 
Limited Section 121 Exclusion Print E-mail

Limited Exclusions on Sale of Primary Residence Previously Used as Second Home or Rental Property – New Rules
Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008

By Robert M. Swaim, E.A.
May 28, 2009

Life is getting tougher for some people who own more than one home.

Part of the 2008 housing-stimulus package could reduce -- though not eliminate -- the appeal of a tax-saving strategy used by taxpayers who own multiple homes.  While the new law won't affect the vast majority of the nation's homeowners, it will likely affect some people planning to sell their primary residence, claim the full home-sale exclusion to pay little or no capital-gains taxes -- and then move to a second or third home they've owned for some time, convert it into their primary residence for the next two years, sell it and once again pay little or no capital-gains tax.

Under new law, most homeowners can sell their primary residence and exclude as much as $250,000 of the gain if they're single, or $500,000 if they're married and filing jointly with their spouse. To qualify for the full exclusion, owners typically must have owned the home and used it as their primary residence for at least two of the five years prior to the sale.

Under the new law, which takes effect starting in 2009, many owners might not be eligible to claim the full exclusion on a vacation or rental home they convert to a primary residence.  Congressional staffers estimate the new restrictions will raise about $1.4 billion in revenue for the U.S. Treasury Department over the coming decade. The move was designed to plug what Congress sees as a major loophole in a law.

Tax experts predict the new law probably will prompt some wealthy people who own several homes to rethink the home-hopper strategy. "I know one individual with four homes who had planned to convert each of his three vacation and resort properties to a principal residence" and sell each at varying intervals to take advantage of the full home-sale exclusion, thus paying little or no capital gains tax.  That client will pay more tax under the new rules.

In the late 1990s, real-estate agents, developers and others discovered special benefits for home-hoppers: These owners could pay little or no capital-gains taxes by carefully timing which home they used as their primary residence and when they sold it.  For example: consider a married couple with several homes who had lived in their main home for two years or more. They typically could sell their primary residence, exclude as much as $500,000 of the gain from tax -- and then move into a vacation home, make it their new primary residence, live in it two years or more, sell it and once again take advantage of the full $500,000 exclusion.

Under the new law, you can't exclude the gain from the sale of the home allocated to periods of "nonqualified use." That typically refers to any period (after the end of 2008) when the property isn't used by you, your spouse or former spouse as a principal residence.  Note that the new law is effective only for sales beginning in 2009.

Example: Suppose a married couple buys a home on Jan. 1, 2009 for $600,000.  They plan to hold it as an investment.  On Jan. 1, 2012 -- three years later -- they begin using it as their principal residence. They live there two years and sell it on Jan. 1, 2014 for $1.1 million, for a profit of $500,000.

Under the old law, they would have been able to exclude the entire $500,000 gain from their taxable income.  But under the new law, they could exclude only two-fifths of the gain, or $200,000, since the other three-fifths would be considered attributable to the three years the home wasn't their principal residence.

Robert Swaim holds a Masters in Accounting and is an Enrolled Agent in Atlanta, GA.  He works with real estate investors for tax returns, audit defense and other IRS problems. He can be contacted at 404-607-8400 or This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 15
All information, content and materials contained or offered on this site are our copyrighted property and may NOT be posted on other sites without written persmission from www.Assets101.com. No information, content or material from any Sites or Services may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted ordistributed in any way, except that you may download one copy of the information, content or materials on any single computer for your personal, noncommercial home use.

Copyright © 2010 - Assets101.com - Site Developed by Mint Creation.